Smt. Parvathamma v. Yogappa
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a regular second appeal where office objections were not complied with within the stipulated time despite being granted an extension.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks' time granted for compliance of office objections subject to payment of costs; otherwise dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O. GIDDANAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE,
R/O NELAGALALE VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
HOSANAGARA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 426.
...APPELLANT/S
(By Sri./Smt : HARISH KUMAR M.S., K.S. ACHYUTA.V.RAO., GANGADHARA D.C., ADVOCATES)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O. GIDDANAIKA
- respondent
YOGAPPA S/O MANJA NAIKA
- respondent
KUBERAPPA S/O MANJA NAIKA
- respondent
KRISHNAPPA S/O MANJA NAIKA
- respondent
PUTE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/135/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court