Kotholla Subbanna v. Smt. Rathnamma
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second revisional appeal regarding a permanent injunction, the High Court found no substantial question of law as the dispute over other sites did not affect the order on the specific suit property.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:19716 RSA No. 1035 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1035 OF 2015 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
KOTHOLLA SUBBANNA S/O KOTHOLLA RAMANA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT SEETHAREDDIPALLI, CHELUR HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK-563124.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KARUMBAIAH T A.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O S.Y. VENKATARAVANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT SEETHAREDDIPALLI VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK-563124.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's claim regarding other sites forms a substantial question of law to challenge the injunction on the suit property.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotholla Subbanna
- respondent
Smt. Rathnamma
Coram
Suraj Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1035/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court