Jeevanna v. Smt Noorpatima
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a tenant challenging the eviction decree of a society. The tenant was granted four months to vacate.
What did the court decide?
Regular Second Appeal dismissed; four months time granted to tenant to vacate premises.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:37638 RSA No. 1033 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1033 OF 2023 (EJE)
BETWEEN:
JEEVANNA S/O BADAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE SHOP OWNER, MAHILA SAMAJ COMPLEX MARENAHALLI ROAD JAGALUR TOWN, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577528.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIGNESHWAR S. SHASTRI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of CPC requires substantial question of law.
Whether the tenant was legally evicted from the suit premises by compliance of notice as per Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
JEEVANNA S/O BADAPPA
- respondent
SMT. NOORPATIMA W/O HUSSIANMIYA
- respondent
SMT. INDIRA W/O MANOHARAREDDY
- respondent
SMT. SHAMEER W/O PAKEERAPPA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1033/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court