Appellant filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal alleging settlement. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:18371 RSA No. 100476 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
RSA NO. 100476 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. KARIYAMMADEVI BADAVANE SUDHARANA SAMITI, GADAG, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI.MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA S/O. DESAIGOUDA DESAIGOUDAR, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KARIYAMMADEVI BADAVANE, NEAR KARIYAMMADEVI TEMPLE, GADAG-582101, TQ. AND DIST. GADAG.
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
VISHALNINGAPPAPATTIHAL by VISHALNINGAPPAPATTIHALDate:2024.12.19
10:40:27
+0530
SHRI. SHANKARANANDA SWAMY CLAIMS TO BE MAHANTA OF SHREE MUKKANNESHWAR MATH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. RELIGIOUS PREACHING, KARIYAMMADEVI BADAVANE, GADAG-582101, TQ. AND DIST. GADAG.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SADASHIV S.PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.11.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.46/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.04.2021, PASSED IN O.S. NO.318/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS-II, GADAG, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
(BY SRI. SADASHIV S.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant did not intend to prosecute the present appeal
and files a memo for withdrawal which reads as under;
“ That the parties in the above Appeal have settled the inter-se dispute with the intervention of the elders and Devotees, hence the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the above Appeal. The memo may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity.”
Memo for withdrawal is taken on record.
In view of the above, appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn .
SD/-
_____________________ (JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)
PJ CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI. KARIYAMMADEVI BADAVANE SUDHARANA SAMITI
SHRI. SHANKARANANDA SWAMY
K.S.HEMALEKHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
