Aruna G v. Mahesh R v
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition against a Family Court order allowing an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. was withdrawn on the petitioner's memo, with liberty to file an appropriate petition.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:7922 RPFC No. 42 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 42 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
ARUNA G D/O GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT 1ST CROSS, NAGANNANA PALYA MAIN ROAD, HEMAVATHI BLOCK, IDSMT BADAVANE, SIRA GATE TUMAKURU 572101
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. RAJESH ., ADVOCATE FOR; SRI. G S VENKAT SUBBA RAO.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MAHESH R V S/O VEERAMALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, SRINAGAR, KYATHASANDRA, TUMAKURU 572101
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aruna G
- respondent
Mahesh R V
Coram
Lalitha Kanneganti
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RPFC/42/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court