A Regular Petition Filing Chall under Family Court Act was heard on 19.09.2024. The petitioner was absent on two consecutive dates, indicating lack of interest. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. No specific legal proposition was laid down.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the petitioner on consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:38699 RPFC No. 36 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 36 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
CHANDAN R., S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT EWS 196, IST STAGE, 4TH CROSS, KUVEMPUNAGARA, JT EXTENSION, MYSORE - 570 001
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJU C.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PETITIONER NO.2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. VIDYA SHREE, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.345, D BLOCK,
NC: 2024:KHC:38699 RPFC No. 36 of 2024
RAMAKRISHNANAGARA, MYSORE 570 002
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.713/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
This is the RPFC of 2024. The office objections are not complied with. When this matter came up before this Court on 18.09.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed for 'dismissal' today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
KA, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
CHANDAN R.
SMT. VIDYASHREE
KUMARI REETU
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
