Maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., challenged via RPFC under Family Courts Act, was dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioner failed to comply with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:28595 RPFC No. 30 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
RPFC NO. 30 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETHA H K W/O B.R. PRADEEP AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT L-75, 2ND CROSS KANAKANAPALYA, 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 011 …PETITIONER
(BY SMT. JAYASHREE G., ADV. - ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
SRI. PRADEEP B R S/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.121 3RD A MAIN ROAD SHAKTHI GARDEN KALYANANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 072 …RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 5.07.2023 PASSED IN C.MISC NO.314/2017 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU.,DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI)
objections. As per Registry, office objections have not been complied. None appears for petitioner.
Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
KNM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SMT. GEETHA H K
SRI. PRADEEP B R
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
