The court dismissed the revision petition for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with office objections and non-payment of cost. The petitioner was also penalized with an additional cost.
None. Petion dismissed for non-prosecution with a cost of Rs.5,000/- imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 5 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
MR. MOHAMMAD AJEEM, S/O ABDUL GHANI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: MACHINE OPERATOR, R/AT BIG HOUSE, KILPADY, MULKI, MANGALURU TALUK – 574 154.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DINESHKUMAR RAO K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE R/AT FLAT NO.105, SAS APARTMENT, BEHIND KANKANADY MARKET,
KANKANADY,
MANGALURU – 574 154.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.07.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.CASE No.13/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, D.K., MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.PC. FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Matter was listed for further orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for 7th time on 30.01.2024. Order sheet would indicate that office objections were complied. However, there was no compliance. For incorrect submission cost of Rs.1,000/- was imposed and ten days time was granted to comply with office objections.
None appears even today. Neither office objections are complied nor cost is paid.
Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution by imposing further cost of Rs.5,000/-.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has complied with office objections and paid the imposed cost?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohammad Ajeem
Mrs. Sabeeha
Master Abdul Ahad
Master Abdus Samad
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
