Revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against a maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was withdrawn on the petitioner's memo and dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REV.PETITION FAMILY COURT NO.106 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANJUM PASHA, S/O V. AZEEMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT CYBER BUSINESS, STARNET, VIJAYAPURA MAIN ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALURU, R/AT NEAR VIDYABHARATHI SCHOOL, GOWRIKALUVE, CHIKKAMAGALURU -577 101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. SARA JABEEN, W/O ANJUM PASHA, D/O MASOOD AHMED AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O VIJAYAPURA EXTENSION CHIKKAMGALURU CITY – 577 101
…RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2019 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.No.31/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE C/c PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU PARTLY ALLOWING
NC: 2024:KHC:1356 RPFC No. 106 of 2020
THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo for withdrawal of the petition.
withdrawn .
I.A.No.1/2020 does not survive for consideration and it is
disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI. ANJUM PASHA
SMT. SARA JABEEN
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
