Review petition against an order in a writ petition concerning a property dispute with the Bangalore Development Authority; petitioners sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the order afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:22910 RP No. 73 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA REVIEW PETITION NO.73 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRESENTLY R2 AND R2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.106 (2878/2) I MAIN, KODIHALLI, H.A.L II STAGE BENGALURU-560 008.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJATH .D.V, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2024:KHC:22910 RP No. 73 of 2024
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 AND ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN W.P.NO.6504/2009 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE COURT, BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 09/01/2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.6504/2022 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
After addressing the arguments at length, learned
counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and a memo dated 24.06.2024 is filed to that effect with liberty to challenge the order in accordance with law.
NC: 2024:KHC:22910 RP No. 73 of 2024
is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Krishnappa
T. Girish
T. Thulasi Kumar
S. Gajendra
G. Somashekar
Bangalore Development Authority
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
