A review petition seeking review of the court's earlier order in a civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of counsel and no appearance by either side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 200063 OF 2023
IN
CRP NO. 200014 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI CHAITANYAKUMAR CHANDRIKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-K:4749 RP No. 200063 of 2023
- 4 - NC: 2024:KHC-K:4749 RP No. 200063 of 2023
R/O ALAND, NOW MEHEBOOB NAGAR COLONY, KALBURAGI-585302.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RP IS FILED U/O 47 RULE 1 R/W 506, 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 09.02.2023 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN CRP NO.200014/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO DISMISS THE CRP NO.200014/2022.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING
ORDER
None appears for the petitioners.
It is forthcoming that there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners on 07.06.2024 and hence the matter was ordered to be relisted on 21.06.2024. Thereafter, on 21.06.2024, learned counsel for the petitioners sought for a short accommodation and as a final chance the matter was adjourned to this date.
However, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners or respondents. Hence, the above petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sh CT:GSM List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Mustafa
Gauhar Jahan
Shahiahan
Shahin Begum
Malliha Fatima
Erum Fatima
C.M. Poonacha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
