Regular First Appeal (PAR) dismissed for lack of prosecution as the appellant was absent, following acceptance of the memo of retirement filed by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2008 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
K.B. RAJANNA, S/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, KAKARAMANAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK AND DIST - 571 511
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI: K.B. RAGANNA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT KAKARAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 571 511.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: H.B. CHANDRASHEKAR FOR R1 TO R3
SRI: PARAMASHIVAIAH FOR R4 TO R7)
THIS RFA FILED U/S 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 18.1.08 PASSED IN OS 296/06 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, (SR.DN), RAMANAGAR, ALLOWING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION & SEPERATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court by order dated 27.09.2023 accepted memo of
retirement filed by the counsel for appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant was also permitted to
retire from the case.
As per endorsement of the District and Sessions Judge,
Ramanagara Court, notice is served on the appellant.
Sri. Rajanna-appellant called out absent.
NC: 2024:KHC:14578 RFA No. 874 of 2008
Left with no alternative, appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54
K.B. Rajanna
Smt. Leelavathi
Smt. Chandrakala
Chandrashekar
Smt. Madamma
Smt. K.B. Hombamma
V Srischananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
