Order dismissing an appeal against a partition suit judgment due to non-compliance with office objections within the granted time limit.
Appeal dismissed due to non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
AND
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE G. BASAVARAJA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 792 OF 2023
BETWEEN
BOTH ARE CHILDREN OF LATE SMT. JINNAMMA
R/AT FLAT NO. 306, 3RD FLOOR, OMKRISHNA CO-COP. HSG. SOC., BHUSARALI, KALWA, THANE DISTRICT - 400 605 MAHARASTRA STATE
PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF KARDAD HOUSE SANADA BAKYARU, KOLAKE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
APPELLANTS
(By Sri.H.JAYAKARA SHETTY, Advocate)
RFA.No.792/2023
2
AND
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 09 R/AT KARDAD HOUSE
3
RFA.No.792/2023
SANADA BAKYARU, KOLAKE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS NO.10 TO 11 R/AT KARDAD HOUSE SANANDA BAKYARU, KOLAKE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS NO.12 TO 14 R/AT KARDAD HOUSE SANADA BAKYARU, KOLAKE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
RFA.No.792/2023
4
NO.15 TO 19 R/AT MATADABAILU, SANOOR VILLAGE AND POST, KARKALA TALUK,
R/AT BEKALA KAMBALA PADU HOUSE, TENKANIDIYOOR VILLAGE, KRODASHRAMA POST, UDUPI TAUK.
5
RFA.No.792/2023
RFA.No.792/2023
6
37 . SRI. DIVAKAR SHETTY D/O LATE PADMAYYA SHETTY AGED 56 YEARS, 38 . SMT. SHARMILA, D/O LATE PADMAYYA SHETTY AGED 54 YEARS NO.30 TO 38 R/AT 487A NANAPETH, NEAR NANAPETH POST OFFICE, PUNE - 411 011 MAHARASTRA STATE.
Respondents
RFA.No.792/2023
7
------------------------This Regular First Appeal filed under section 96 R/W order 41 Rule 1 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.12.2022 passed in OS No.28/2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Karkala, Dismissing the Suit for Partition.
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
One week’s time is granted for compliance of office Objections, failing which, the Appeal stands rejected on its own.
Sd/-
JUDGE
JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.20.02.2024 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : MK R By : DS C By : RM
Girija Shetty
Susheela J Shetty
Devaki Shedthi
Sumathi Shedthi
Jaya N Shetty
Krishna S. Dixit
G. Basavaraja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
