Disposed

Kum Lakshmi v. Sri T S Natarajan

Karnataka HC22 Feb 2024RFA/720/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellants in a regular first appeal against a partial decree for partition and separate possession filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, requesting the trial court to proceed with final decree proceedings. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of as withdrawn on appellants' memo; Registry to send copy of order to respondents by speed post.

Kum Lakshmi Vs Sri T S Natarajan — Partition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:7581-DB RFA No. 720 of 2014

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 720 OF 2014

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

KUM. LAKSHMI

¶11

D/OF T.S.SHARADA AND AJAYSIMHA, AGED 18 YEARS, NO.421, 7^TH MAIN, VIJAYA BANK COLONY, BANGALORE-560070.

¶12

KUM. PREETHI, AGED 12 YEARS,

¶13

BOTH ARE DAUGHTERS OF SMT. T.S.SHARADA AND SRI.AJAYASIMHA,

¶14

Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

BOTH BEING MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR, NEXT FRIEND AND FATHER, SRI.AJAYASIMHA, HINDU AGED 50 YEARS, AND WITH HIM RESIDING AT NO.131 (NEW NO.520), NEW DIAGONAL ROAD, 3^RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 011.

¶16

…APPELLANTS

¶17

(BY SRI. S KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

¶18

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:7581-DB RFA No. 720 of 2014

¶19

AND:

¶20

SRI. T S NATARAJAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶21

SRI.T.S.NITYANANDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶22

SRI. T.S. SACHIDANANDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶23

ALL ARE SONS OF SRI. T.S.SIVASWAMY, R/AT POORNIMA BUILDING, NO.28, BASAPPA ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. P B RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 & R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶26

THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96, O-41, RULE-1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.01.2014 PASSED IN O.S.5553/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND ETC.

¶27

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

¶29

NC: 2024:KHC:7581-DB RFA No. 720 of 2014

¶30

JUDGMENT

¶31

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 18.01.2024 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this

¶32

appeal, which is signed by both the appellants.

¶33

2. Memo reads as under:

¶34

"The appellants pray that the Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the appeal. The appeal be dismissed as not pressed. The trial court be directed to proceed with final decree proceedings in the original suit in the interest of equity and justice."

¶35

In view of the above, appeal is disposed of as

¶36

having been withdrawn.

¶37

Registry to send a copy of this order to the respondents

¶38

by speed post immediately.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/JUDGE

SMJ

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Kum Lakshmi v. Sri T S Natarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kum Lakshmi v. Sri T S Natarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R Rathanprem Vs Sri.M K Ramegowda

Sri. Mahadeva @ Mahadevu Vs Smt. Mahadevamma

Smt. Nandini a T Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Ramaswamy Reddy @ Rama Swamy Vs Sri H C Vasu S/O Chinna Bayyappa

Chairman Vs Smt K Chandrika

Sri Imran Pasha N R Vs the Commissioner