Dismissed

M/S Annapurna Enterprises v. M/S Capronics Pvt. Ltd.

Karnataka HC9 Aug 2024RFA/510/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal filed by appellants under Section 96 of CPC against a decree recovering money. Court held appeal against second appellant abated due to death with no legal representatives. Consequently, court dismissed the appeal against first appellant as also abated.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as it stands abated following the death of the second appellant without representation.

M/S Annapurna Enterprises Vs M/S… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:32085 RFA No. 510 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 510 OF 2017 (MON)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S. ANNAPURNA ENTERPRISES, A PROPRIETARY CONCERN, NO.8B, III CROSS, 10^TH MAIN ROAD, WARD NO.03, KAMMAGONDANA HALLI, BANGALORE-560 015. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. PRABHAKARA MURTHY.

¶9

Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SRI. PRABHAKARA MURTHY FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PLAINTIFF, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF 1^ST DEFENDANT M/S. ANNAPURNA ENTERPRISES, NO.8B, III CROSS, 10^TH MAIN ROAD, WARD NO.03, KAMMAGONDANNA HALLI, BANGALORE-560 015.

¶11

…APPELLANTS

¶12

(BY SRI. T RAJARAM, ADVOCATE (ABSENT); V/O DATED 15.06.2023, APPEAL AGAINST APPELLANT 2 STANDS ABATED)

¶13

AND:

¶14

M/S CAPRONICS PVT.LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE

¶15

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32085 RFA No. 510 of 2017

¶16

COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.91/B, ELECTRONICS CITY, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 100, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. MR SHVARAM, S/O. LATE SRI. ML RAMACHANDRA SETTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶19

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.12.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.7977/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE., AT BANGALORE (CCH-28) DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

¶21

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶23

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶24

None appears for the appellant. In fact, the appeal against second appellant stood abated as no steps are taken to bring the legal representatives of deceased second appellant. The first appellant is a proprietary concern represented by the

¶25

¶26

NC: 2024:KHC:32085 RFA No. 510 of 2017

¶27

second appellant. Since the appeal against second appellant stood abated, consequently, the appeal against the first appellant is also dismissed as abated.

¶28

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶29

YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

M/S Annapurna Enterprises v. M/S Capronics Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Annapurna Enterprises v. M/S Capronics Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Usha Prasanna Vs Smt.R.Pushpa

Sri K Rajanna Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

M/S Ficom Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs M/S India Technocrates

Vijaya Bank Vs Smt. Savithramma R.C

Sri. H. Nagarajappa Vs Sri. Kiran Kumar

Dr. Ambedkar Mission Education Vs Mrs. v. Sunitha Bai