Appeal withdrawn on the party-in-person's memo seeking return of papers to refile before the proper court with corrections. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty and excluded time spent from limitation computation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:39124 RFA No. 372 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 372 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
D/O K. RAJAPPA, AGE 51 YEARS, BANNINAGARA, SIRA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. R. REKHA, PARTY IN PERSON)
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., SEEKING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
NC: 2024:KHC:39124 RFA No. 372 of 2024
23.11.2023 PASSED IN FR NO.853/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Party-in-person is present before the Court and files
a memo, which reads as under :
" The undersigned respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may pleased be return the appeal papers for its presentation before the proper Court on making necessary correction/amendment.
Hence, necessary orders for withdrawal may be passed in the interest of justice."
the purpose of computation of the limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
the impugned judgment after taking the photocopy thereof.
purpose.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT: BHK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal could be withdrawn so that the appellant may present it before the proper court after corrections.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R. Rekha
Rajendra S.P
Jayaramaiah
Kantappa
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
