Mr Shivanna N v. Smt Mahadevamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a decree for partition and separate possession was withdrawn after the parties settled the dispute, with pending interlocutory applications rendered infructuous.
Appeal against a decree for partition and separate possession was withdrawn after the parties settled the dispute, with pending interlocutory applications rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:26721-DB RFA No. 356 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
MR SHIVANNA N, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE CONGRESS NANJUNDE GOWDA, R/O OKKALAGERI (MASIDI BEEDI), GUNDLUPET, CHAMARAJ NAGAR DISTRICT- 571 111.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H MALATESH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 124.
RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT: OKKALAGERI (MASIDI BEEDI), GUNDLUPET - 571 111.
VIJAYA NAGAR, GUNDLUPET - 571 111.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4, R1, R5 TO R8 ARE SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.71/2017 (125/2015) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, V KAMESWAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri.H.Malatesh, learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal dated 11.07.2024, which reads as under:
“The undersigned Advocate for the petitioner respectfully submits that, as from the information from the instructing counsel, the dispute between the parties in above said case is settled, hence permitted to withdraw above said appeal in the interest of justice.”
prayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
withdrawn.
and as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
SMC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr Shivanna N
Smt Mahadevamma
Smt Akkamma
Smt Laxmamma
Smt Gowramma
Sri Nagaraju N
V Kameswar Rao
C M Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court