R S Bhaskar v. Smt. R S Padma
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal against a decree for partition and separate possession was withdrawn at the appellant's request; the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's instructions.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:19819-DB RFA No. 319 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
R.S. BHASKAR S/O LATE B.R. SHIVASHANKARAARADHYA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT RAMASAMUDRA TOWN CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE STREET CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI P. MAHESHA, ADV.)
AND:
- SMT. R.S. PADMA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.S. BHASKAR
- respondent
SMT. R.S. PADMA
- respondent
SMT. R.S. HEMALATHA (DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE)
- respondent
C. RENUKARADYA
- respondent
M.R. NAGARJUNA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/319/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court