M R Shankaranarayana v. M R Somashekar
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal arising from a partition suit decided on a settlement. The High Court accepted a compromise petition where parties agreed to sell the indivisible property via auction and share proceeds, modifying the impugned decree.
What did the court decide?
Compromise petition accepted; impugned judgment and decree modified in terms of the settlement and directions issued to register final decree.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:15864 RFA No. 260 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 260 OF 2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
M R SHANKARANARAYANA, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
- S S RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE M.R.SHANKARANARAYANA, R/AT NO.41, 'NEMMADI', PEARL HABITAT, VIJAYANAGAR 4TH STAGE, BELAVADI, MYSORE-570018.
Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- SMT PADMINI RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D/O LATE M.R.SHANKARANARAYANA, W/O K.R.RAMESH, R/AT NO.223, 8TH MAIN, ARAKERE MICO LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 076.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compromise petition submitted by parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC should be accepted.
Whether the impugned judgment and decree in the underlying partition suit should be modified in terms of the settlement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S S Ramesh and Others
- respondent
Varalakshmi and Others
Coram
Anant Ramannath Hegde
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/260/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court