Appeals against decrees for permanent injunction were dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to memos filed by the appellants seeking leave to withdraw. The judgment decides nothing of general application.
Appeals dismissed as withdrawn on appellants' memos.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1964 OF 2005 (INJ) C/W REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1960 OF 2005 (INJ) REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1961 OF 2005 (INJ) REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1963 OF 2005 (INJ)
IN RFA No. 1964/2005
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/AT AMRUTHHALLI VILLAGE YALAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO. 46, 6TH CROSS,GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T.N. ARAKESHWARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.25.07.05 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3048/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-16), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
IN RFA NO. 1960/2005
BETWEEN:
AL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BOTH ARE R/O NO.2283 9TH MAIN, D BLOCK SECOND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 010.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N. ARKESHWAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.25.07.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1889/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-16), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
IN RFA NO. 1961/2005
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT AMRUTHHALLI VILLAGE YALAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T.N. ARAKESHWARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.25.07.05 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1981/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-16), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
IN RFA NO. 1963/2005
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT AMRUTHHALLI VILLAGE YALAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T.N. ARAKESHWARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.25.07.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2544/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-16), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL JUDGMENT
Appellants are present before the Court.
SD/(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84
SMT NEELAMMA W/O K.C. VENKATESHAPPA
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI W/O ASWATHANARAYANA
SRI. ASWATHANARAYANA S/O D.V. NARAYANAPPA
SRI BHUPENDRA B. DANI
M.S. LOKESH
N.S. VIJAYAKUMARI
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
