Appeal against dismissal of a suit for permanent injunction was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants' counsel was absent on the date of hearing and the appellants had not been diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1616 OF 2019 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MALATESH (BY SRI. GIRISHA S HEGDE., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) K C AND: Location: HIGH COURT OF 1. SRI. VIKRAM BASHA KHAN, KARNATAKA AGD ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O ABDUL AZEEZ, NO.11, 'MST STEEL FURNITURES', VINOBANAGAR MAIN ROAD, OPP: KALASIPALYAM POLICE OUT POST, BANGALORE-560 002
…APPELLANTS
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VANAJAKSHI P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RASHEED KHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.06.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.3884/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE CITY (CCH-30) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
representation on behalf of the appellant.
court whose suit for permanent injunction came to be dismissed.
NC: 2024:KHC:32794 RFA No. 1616 of 2019
not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Bhupalraj
S. Madhu
Sri. Vikram Basha Khan
Sri. S.M. Hussain
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
