Regular first appeal against a decree of specific performance was rejected on its own because office objections were not complied with despite time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1562 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SRI. J.RAMESH S/O LATE V.JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16 ‘SRIVARI NILAYA’ 2ND CROSS, CHUNCHAGHATTA VILLAGE KONANKUNTE POST UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU. …..APPELLANT
(BY SRIYUTHS VAIJAYANTHIMALA B, LAKSHMI C.K, NANDHA AND MAMATHA B.L, Advocates)
AND:
SMT. H.N.SOWBHAGYA W/O SRI. L. APPAJI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.41-42/45 ‘SREE GURU KRUPA’ 7TH CROSS, SARASWATHIPURAM NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU. …RESPONDENT
2
RFA.No.1562/2023
This Regular First Appeal filed Under Sec.96 R/W Order-41
Rule 1 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated 06.03.2023 passed in O.S.No.3295/2018 on the file of the XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, decreeing the suit for specific performance.
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Two weeks time is granted for compliance, failing which, the appeal stands rejected on its own.
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.08.02.2024, the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands rejected on its own.
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR
R By: STE C By: JS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
J.Ramesh
H.N.Sowbhagya
Krishna S Dixit
G Basavaraja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
