Regular First Appeal over a suit for declaration and permanent injunction relating to phonographic performance rights. Appellant filed a memo seeking withdrawal; appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no findings on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1429 OF 2012 (IPR)
BETWEEN:
M/S MAC CHARLES (INDIA) LTD., A COMPANY REGD. UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS RANCHISEE NAME AS LE MERIDIEN AND HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT: P.B. NO. 174, NO. 28, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-52, REP. BY ITS COMPANY SECRETARY AND FINANCIAL CONTROLLER: MR. M.S.REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O SRI M BASI REDDY.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI SANJAY NAIR AND KEMPEGOWDA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:11438 RFA No. 1429 of 2012
VETRI NAGAR EXTENSION, CHENNAI-600 082, REP. BY ITS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VENKATESH P DALWAI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96, R/W ORDER 41, RULE 1 CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.6.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4085/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-10), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking
permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S MAC Charles (India) Ltd.
M/S Phonographic Performance Limited
Anant Ramanath Hegde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
