Regular First Appeal under Section 96 CPC dismissed as non-prosecution because appellants failed to appear despite court notices were served and no counsel engaged.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1081 OF 2019(MON)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
D/O B.V. SUDHARSHAN AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER (APPELLANT NO.1) ALL ARE R/AT NO.50, 3RD FLOOR 1ST STAGE, 2ND PHASE, MANJUNATHNAGAR BENGALURU 560010.
(BY SRI. SIJI MALAYIL., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
…APPELLANTS
S NAGARAJ S/O LATE K.N. SHANKARALINGAPPA AGE 63 YEARS R/AT NO.54, 3RD CROSS OKALIPURAM, EXTENSION BENGALURU 560021.
…RESPONDENT
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.02.2019
PASSED INOS.NO.8629/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
been served as per the report submitted by the City Civil Court, Bangaluru for appearance, the appellants neither engaged any other counsel nor appeared before this Court when the matter is called out.
for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
HA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
Smt. Shubha Sudharshan and others
S Nagaraj
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
