2024:KHC-D:17741 RFA No. 100362 of 2018 IN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100362 OF 2018 (PAR/POS-)
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANNABASAMMA W/O. MALLIKARJUNA PURAD, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: KUMARA RAMA BADAVANE, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL-583227.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M AMARE GOUDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: RAYAR ONI, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL-583227.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1-ABATED;
R2, R4 to R6, R8 and R9 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED; R7- NOTICE IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2018 PASSED BY IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT GANGAVATHI IN O.S.NO.35/2014, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
Memo is filed stating that the dispute between the parties is settled, and the appellant does not need to prosecute the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
JUDGE
RKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. CHANNABASAMMA W/O. MALLIKARJUNA PURAD
ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI
SMT. GANGAMMA W/O. LATE GURUPADAGOUDA MALIPATIL
SMT. ANNAPURNA ALIAS SUMANGALA W/O. LATE GURUPADAGOUDA MALIPATIL
SHARANEGOUDA @ SHARANABASANAGOUDA S/O. LATE GURUPADAGOUDA MALIPATIL
SANTOSHGOUDA S/O. LATE GURUPADAGOUDA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
