The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Regular First Appeal as withdrawn by the appellant after accepting a set-offtlement memo. The appeal was filed under Sec. 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100267 OF 2018 (PAR/POS-)
BETWEEN:
SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O. VISHAL SANNAKKI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HONAKUPPI, TQ: GOKAK-591307.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VINAY S. KOUJALAGI AND SMT. VIJAYLAXMI.M.N., ADVOCATES)
AND:
Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HONAKUPPI, TQ: GOKAK-591307.
…RESPONDENTS
(R1 TO R6 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.03.2018 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK IN O.S.NO.320/2015, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
stating that dispute between the parties is settled in terms
of the decree passed in FDP No.55/2019.
Said memo is accepted.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
AM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25
Smt. Annapurna W/o. Vishal Sannakki
Hanamant S/o. Bhimappa Pugashetti
Yallavva W/o. Hanamath Pugashetti
Vivekanand S/o. Hanamath Pugashetti
Smt. Poornima W/o. Beerappa Pandrolli
Smt. Pratibha W/o. Siddarudh Pandrolli
Anant Ramanath Hegde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
