Regular First Appeal against an order in partition suit dismissed for failure to comply with court objections. Court dismissed appeal on ground of non-interest in prosecution.
Appeal dismissed. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6132 RFA No. 100033 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100033/2020(PAR)
BETWEEN:
W/O. SHANKAR MUCHANDI @ GENJI SINCE DECEASED HER LEGAL HEIRS WHO ARE ALREADY ON RECORD.
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI PRAKASH K. JAWALKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…APPELLANTS
ALREADY ARRAYED AS APPELLANT NO.2
SRI. GORAKH RUKMANNA MUCHANDI @ GENJI, SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENTS 2(A) TO (D) HEREIN.
SMT. SUGANDHA GORAKNATH MUCHANDI, SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER LRS.
JANAKI RAMCHANDRA KOWADKAR SINCE DECEASED IS REP. BY LRS.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 RULE 1 OF CPC R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.303/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BELAGAVI DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants prays for time to comply the office objections.
and the same were not complied with. Pursuant to the same, the appeal was came to be dismissed vide order dated 27.09.2023. In-spite of that, office objections are not complied with.
SD/JUDGE
EM/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI VINOD SHANKAR MUCHANDI @ GANJI & OTHS
SRI PRAMOD GORAKNATH MUCHANDI & OTHS
M.G.UMA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
