Dismissed
C P Anupama v. Sri M Shivakumar
Karnataka HCRFA/100/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024:KHC:7880 RFA No. 100 of 2011 IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
2024:KHC:7880 RFA No. 100 of 2011 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:7880 RFA No. 100 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
D/O C T PARTHASARATHYHINDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARSR/AT # 10, ANJANEYA TEMPLE II STREETSESHADRIPURAMBANGALORE-560020
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. PARINEETA S CHANAL.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIGNESHWARA U.,ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.10.2010 PASSED IN O.S.27/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR THE PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the respondents has filed a memo reporting a death of respondents. It is further submitted that the respondents have died in the year 2017 and 2019 respectively.
and 2019 respectively.
representatives within three months from the date of death of
respondents. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/JUDGE
PHM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C P Anupama
C P Roopa
C P Nagesh
M Shivakumar
Jayamma
Anant Ramanath Hegde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court