First appeal filed under Section 74(1) of the LARR Act, 2013 against an LAC judgment. The appellant was absent on the date of decision. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:37582 MFA No. 7887 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7887 OF 2023 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MANCHANBELE PROJECT DIVISION, CAUVERY NIRAVARI NIGAMA LTD RAMANAGARA DIVISION, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE- ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/O NO.669, 2ND STAGE, 10TH MAIN ROAD, HAMPINAGARA, BENGALURU -560 104
NC: 2024:KHC:37582 MFA No. 7887 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA FILED U/S.74 (1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT- 2013, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.01.2022 PASSED IN LAC NO. 252/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED U/S.64 OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL JUDGMENT
When this matter came up on 04.09.2024, as there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and this court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 12.09.2024.
Today when the matter came up there is no
representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter.
NC: 2024:KHC:37582 MFA No. 7887 of 2023
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appeal should proceed when the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The Executive Engineer Manchanbele Project Division, Cauvery Niravari Nigama Ltd Ramanagara Division, Ramanagara District
S.P Ramu LRs B.R.Thara, S.R.Sathish, S.R. Girish
The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer DC Office Complex Bangalore Mysore Road, Ramanagara
Deputy Commissioner Ramanagara District
Principal Secretary Government of Karnataka, Revenue Department
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
