Smt B Prema Latha v. Sri v Selva Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
A guardianship appeal under the Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on repeated hearing dates.
A guardianship appeal under the Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on repeated hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:19401-DB MFA No. 7842/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7842/2017 (GW)
BETWEEN:
SMT B PREMA LATHA W/O. MR.V SELVA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT OM SAI DWARAKA NO.434, 6TH B MAIN 2ND FLOOR, ADJ ROYAL CONCORDE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 043
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.434, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH B MAIN ROAD HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 043 … APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G NAGARAJA GOWDA AND SRI.K.NARASIMHA MURTHY, ADVOCATES (ABSENT)
Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
SRI V SELVA KUMAR S/O. SRI. R. VINYAGA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.3, ESHWARI NILAYAM 12TH CROSS, VASAVAMBA ROAD RAMAMURTHY NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 016 … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S JOHN AND M M MICHAEL, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 (A) OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.2017 PASSED IN G AND WC 271/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE V
NC: 2024:KHC:19401-DB MFA No. 7842/2017
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT ST BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 25 OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND WARDS ACT.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellant.
The records show that even on the previous hearing dates
there was no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt B Prema Latha
Sri V Selva Kumar
K.S. Mudagal
Vijaykumar A. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court