plaintiff in the suit schedule property, which was a site bearing No.93 situate on Kumaran's School Road, Doddakallasandra, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. The plaintiff claimed that he was the absolute owner of the suit schedule property. He contended that the defendant No.3 had executed a sale certificate dated 12.02.2013 conveying the suit property to the plaintiff and his wife, which was duly registered. Subsequent thereto, his wife executed a deed of release relinquishing her 50% ownership in the suit schedule property, consequent to which, the plaintiff became the full and absolute owner. He claimed that the defendant No.1 as the proprietor of M/s. Sreenidhi Stone Crushers, had availed a business loan from defendant No.3 by mortgaging suit schedule property and defendant No.2 stood guarantor. He claimed that since the defendant Nos.1 and 2 were defaulters, the defendant No.3 - bank took out proceedings, which ultimately ended in a public auction on 31.10.2012, whereat the plaintiff and his wife were the successful bidders. The defendant Nos.1 and 2 challenged the auction sale before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in S.A.No.671/2012, which was dismissed on 06.02.2013. An appeal was filed in R.A.No.3/2013 before the Debts Recovery
