B. Ramappa v. the Special Land Acquisition Officer Utp
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge allowed a reference petition petition increasing market value of land. A first appellate court dismissed the subsequent appeal. The High Court Bench disposed of the First Appeal No. 675 of 2016 allowing the appellant to get same compensation as earlier decided but explicitly denied interest for the delayed period.
What did the court decide?
Appellant entitled to same compensation with statutory benefits; interest for delay period denied.