Motor accident compensation enhancement appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was continuously absent and showed no interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:1022-DB MFA No. 6719 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6719 OF 2016 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH SHAM S/O AROKIASWAMY, AGED 20 YEARS, R/AT # 3711, CAUVERY NAGAR, 9TH MAIN, B S K 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRIDHAR D S., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VEENA KUMARI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANT R/AT NO. 1501, 26TH CROSS, 25TH MAIN, 2ND SECTOR, H S R LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 102.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M. ARUN PONNAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.04.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.3664/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for respondent is present physically.
appellant is continuously absent before the Court. This appeal is of the year 2016. Sufficient time has been taken by the appellant to submit on admission. Today also, he is absent. There is no representation.
It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Joseph Sham S/o Arokiaswamy
M/s ICICI General Insurance Co Ltd.
Uttappa M A
H.B. Prabhakara Sastry
Ramachandra D. Huddar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
