Appellant appealed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act against an award allowing reference. Court granted time to pay fees on objections. Appeal was ultimately dismissed for non-compliance.
Appeal stands dismissed for failure to comply with the order to show cause regarding payment of fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6408 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE PUTTASHAMAIAH, CHIKKAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
..APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K.J. JAGADEESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
..RESPONDENTS
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 54(1) of LAND
ACQUISITION ACT, against the Judgment and Award dated
2
MFA No.6408/2023
07.06.2019 passed in LAC No.305/2009 (OLD NO.24/2008) on
the file of the SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, allowing the reference U/S.18 of Land Acquisition Act.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
One week’s time is granted to comply with the office objections on cost of Rs.1,000/- to be paid to the High Court Advocates’ Association.
By that time, if the office objections are not complied with, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
NOTE: Court Order dated 02.09.2024, not complied with. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: AR
R By: MR
C By: YL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. RAJANNA AID ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O LATE PUTTASHAMAIAH
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS) SOUTHERN RAILWAYS
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
