This judgment dismisses a Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for non-prosecution, as no representation was made by the appellant on the hearing date.
The Miscellaneous First Appeal No.5990 of 2013 was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:14784 MFA No. 5990 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5990 OF 2013(MV-I)
BETWEEN:
K.SHANKARANARAYANA @ SHANKARANARAYANA REDDY.C.K., S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT, NO.238, 12TH MAIN, 18TH CROSS, LAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE-30, PERMANENT ADDRESS, CHEEKUR VILLAGE, BYKUR POST, MULABAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R.LAKSHMANA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:14784 MFA No. 5990 of 2013
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.SHANKARAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. O.MAHESH., ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R3-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED:21.03.2018)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:04.04.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.5903/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND XXXI ACMM, MACT, BANGALORE.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellant, either personally or through video conferencing.
Sri.O.Mahesh., learned counsel for respondent No.2 has appeared through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 04.04.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, hence the office was
directed to list this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 15.04.2024.
The appeal is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Miscellaneous First Appeal should be allowed in the absence of the appellant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Shankaranarayana @ Shankaranarayana Reddy.C.K.
Ravindra.K
The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.
Jayaprakash
Jyoti Muliman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
