Disposed

Eranna v. Narasimhamurthy C M

Karnataka HC2 Feb 2024MFA/560/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Motor accident claim appeal seeking enhancement of compensation was settled in Lok Adalat; insurer agreed to pay an additional lump sum of Rs.90,000/- over the Tribunal award, depositable within six weeks failing which interest at 9% p.a.

What did the court decide?

Enhanced compensation of Rs.90,000/- payable by insurer in addition to Tribunal award, released to appellant/claimant on proper identification.

Eranna Vs Narasimhamurthy C M — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 02^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

¶7

¶8

SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 560/2023 (MV)

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 689/2024)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

Eranna S/o Rangadamappa, Aged about 33 years, R/at Chinnenahalli Village, Midigeshi Hobli, Madhugiri Taluk, Tumakuru District. ...APPELLANT

¶13

(By Sri. Sathisha T., Advocate)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Narasimha Murthy C.M., S/o Muddappa, Major, R/o Chinnenahalli Village, Midigeshi Hobli, Madhugiri Taluk,

¶16

Tumakuru District-572 101.

¶17

The Manager, TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., 2^nd Floor, JP & Devi Jambukeshwara Arcade,

¶18

¶19

No.69, Millers Road, Bengaluru – 560 052. …RESPONDENTS

¶20

(By Sri. B. Pradeep, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.c.o. dated 24.01.2023)

¶21

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.07.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 998/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, MADHUGIRI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶22

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶23

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶25

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶26

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.90,000/- (Rupees Ninety Thousand only), in

¶27

¶28

addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶29

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

¶30

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶31

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶32

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶33

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

Sd/MEMBER

¶36

Rbv

Eranna v. Narasimhamurthy C M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eranna v. Narasimhamurthy C M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karnataka State Road, Vs D.L. Huchegowda

The Divisional Controller Vs Sri Shivashankar K T

Manikantan Vs the Divisional Controller

N. Thippeswamy Vs Kesani Murali Naidu

Smt. Syamala @ Shamala Vs New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Smt. Paramma Vs Sri Raviprakash