Subbanna v. the Assistant Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, the High Court of Karnataka set aside the Trial Court's dismissal of a compensation enhancement petition remanding the matter for fresh evidence determination. The Court held that the initial protest letter constituted a valid reference application and the subsequent proceedings were not time-barred.
What did the court decide?
Impugned judgment set aside and matter remanded to the Trial Court for determination of market value/compensation permitting parties to lead evidence within six months.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:29495-DB MFA No.4465/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4465/2016 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
SUBBANNA
- S/O MALAIAH
- AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS SINCE DEAD BY LRs
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court was justified in rejecting the claim petition for reference of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act?
Whether the reference petition filed by the claimant was time barred based on the interpretation of the initial protest letter?
Whether sufficient evidence was adduced to determine the market value of the acquired land converted to non-agricultural use?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SUBBANNA
- appellant
SMT. D. VEERAMMA
- appellant
PRAVEEN .C.P
- appellant
PAVAN KUMAR .C.P
- appellant
KRISHNAMURTHY
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/4465/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court