Dismissed

Smt B M Sunitha v. Sri. Naveen Kumar B v

Karnataka HC25 Oct 2024MFA/4356/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal against a Family Court judgment of divorce is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant filed memos stating the matrimonial dispute was amicably settled, and she received Rs. 45 lakhs from the respondent towards full and final settlement, acknowledging the receipt of cheques in court.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by appellant; decree of divorce confirmed.

Smt B M Sunitha Vs Sri. Naveen Kumar B v — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:43118-DB MFA No. 4356 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4356 OF 2021 (FC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN

¶11

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

SMT. B M SUNITHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS W/O SRI NAVEEN KUMAR B V D/O SRI MUNIREDDY R/AT NO.199, 7^TH CROSS BELLANDURU VILLAGE BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560103.

¶13

(BY SRI. SURESH S - ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

…APPELLANT

¶16

SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR B V AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O SRI VENUGOPAL REDDY R/AT NO.200, 8^TH CROSS BELLANDURU VILLAGE BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560 103.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(BY SRI. SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K - ADVOCATE)

¶19

THIS MFA FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT R/W 28(1) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.20.04.2021 PASSED IN MC NO.2648/2018 ON THE FILE OF

¶20

NC: 2024:KHC:43118-DB MFA No. 4356 of 2021

¶21

¶22

THE IV-ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.

¶23

THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶24

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)

¶26

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree rendered by the Court below in MC No.2648/2018 dated 20.04.2021 allowing the petition filed under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by urging various grounds.

¶27

Learned counsel for the appellant Sri Suresh S for

¶28

the appellant and learned counsel Sri Sanath Kumar Shetty K for the respondent are present before the Court physically inclusive of appellant namely Smt.B.M.Sunitha and respondent namely Sri Naveen Kumar B.V.

¶29

Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶30

seeking withdrawal of the appeal. In the memo it is stated that the dispute between the appellant and respondent is

¶31

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:43118-DB MFA No. 4356 of 2021

¶32

amicably settled. The appellant has received a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- (Rupees thirty five lakhs only) by way of cheque bearing No.582836 dated 25.10.2024 drawn on Karnataka Bank Ltd, Bellanduru Branch, Bengaluru issued by the respondent towards full and final settlement of the matrimonial claims. The appellant has no objection to confirm the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court, Bengaluru.

¶33

In the meanwhile of recording the status of the appeal, counsel for the appellant files another memo dated 25.10.2024 indicating that a sum of Rs.10,00,000/(Rupees ten lakhs only) in the form of cheques bearing No.582837 and 582838 for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- each towards permanent alimony in addition to Rs.35,00,000/(Rupees thirty five lakhs) has been handed over to the appellant namely Smt.B.M.Sunitha by the respondent namely Sri Naveen Kumar B.V. The same may be taken on record and to dispose the present appeal.

¶34

Appellant acknowledges the receipt of the aforesaid cheques totaling to a sum of Rs.45,00,000/-

¶35

4 - NC: 2024:KHC:43118-DB MFA No. 4356 of 2021

¶36

(Rupees forty five lakhs only) from the respondent in the presence of the counsel for the parties. The settlement arrived between the parties is towards full and final settlement of the matrimonial dispute.

¶37

Accordingly, the memos are taken on record. In

¶38

terms of the memos filed by the counsel for the appellant,

¶39

this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶40

Sd/-

¶41

(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE

¶42

Sd/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

¶43

DKB

Smt B M Sunitha v. Sri. Naveen Kumar B v

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt B M Sunitha v. Sri. Naveen Kumar B v

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shivarudramma Vs Sri. v. S. Guruprasad

Sri Channabasappa Vs Sri Rajendra Cholan

Sri Basavaraju Vs Sri Rajendra Cholan

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sunil Kumar Sharma

H.V. Sagar Vs Dr. S. Selvakumar

Kirloskar Electric Company Employees' Vs Sri. Vijay R Kirlosker