brain injury and Left Upper Motor Neuron Facial Nerve Palsy. PW.2 did not point out the extent of disability sustained by the petitioner and the report pertain to the vision test is also not placed before the Tribunal. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the Insurance Company, when Eye Surgeon himself is unable to assess the disability, it is not appropriate to assess the disability on the different footing rather than blur vision can be rectified by using spectacles. Therefore, admittedly, the petitioner is ten years old student at the time of the accident and how the vision affected his future as a student is not explained by placing any relevant evidence. Compensation has to be assessed having regard to the gravity of injury and future of the child. Hence, towards Pain and AgonyRs.40,000/-; Medical expenses, though no bills are produced, Rs.10,000/-; Loss of income during six months laid up period at Rs.5,000/- per month, which works out to Rs.30,000/-; Loss of amenities and discomfort-Rs.50,000/-; Spectacles charges-Rs.11,000/-; Attendant charges-Rs.6,000/-; Food and Nourishment-Rs.10,000/-, Travelling expenses-Rs.3,000/- has to be compensated.
