Land acquisition compensation appeal by the acquiring authority against a reference award was dismissed for non-payment of cost and non-compliance with office objections.
None; appeal dismissed for non-compliance with office objections and non-payment of cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3171 OF 2020 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE RARE MATERIALS PROJECT RATNAHALLI YELAWALA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN M, ADVOCATE) (ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BOTH RESIDING AT ILLAWALA VILLGE ILLAWALA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.12.2017 PASSED IN LAC NO.16/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION U/SEC.18 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant has not paid the cost in terms of the order dated 31.08.2024 and also has not complied with the office objections.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance
of office objections and also non-payment of cost.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
NBM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Rare Materials Project Ratnahalli Yelawala Hobli Mysuru Taluk
Smt.Prema W/o Late Y.S.Srikantegowda
Sri.Shivaramegowda S/o Shivegowda
The Assistant Commissioner Mysore Sub-Division Mysore
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
