Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The Manager Vs Smt Chikkamma — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2024)

Home
Karnataka HC
2024
The Manager Vs Smt ChikkammaThe Manager v. Smt Chikkamma

Dismissed

The Manager v. Smt Chikkamma

Karnataka HC18 Sept 2024MFA/3171/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award was withdrawn by counsel as not pressed; the High Court dismissed the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:38097 MFA No. 3171 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3171 OF 2018 (MV)

BETWEEN:

THE MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, NO.11/9/5 1ST FLOOR,KATKAM K R STATION COMPLEX CITY TALKIES ROAD, RAICHUR REP:BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. REGIONAL OFFICE NO.44/45,LEO SHOPPING COMPLEX RESIDENCY ROAD CROSS BANGALORE-560 001.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SHANKARA REDDY C.,ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

AND:

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Motor Vehicles Act173(1)

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
respondent
Smt Chikkamma W/o Late Hanumaiah
respondent
Ramesh S/o Late Hanumaiah
respondent
Hanumanthaiah S/o Late Hanumaiah
respondent
Mahalakshmi D/o Late Hanumaiah
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 18 Sept 2024 · September
Registered: 16 Apr 2018
Case no.: MFA/3171/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from H.t. Narendra Prasad

Sri Nagaiah Vs Mr Syed Nousad
17 Sept 2024
The Manager L and T Gic Ltd. Vs Lakshman Puda Sutar
17 Sept 2024
The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Umesha
17 Sept 2024
Sri. Papireddy Vs Mr. Venkata Reddy
18 Sept 2024

Cite this judgement

The Manager v. Smt Chikkamma, MFA/3171/2018 (KA), decided on 18 September 2024.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Motor Vehicles Act173(1)

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

H.T. Narendra Prasad

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The appellant insurer sought leave to withdraw its appeal under Section 173(1) of the MV Act challenging the tribunal's award of Rs.4,77,000/- with interest. The memo dated 18.09.2024 seeking withdrawal was taken on record and the appeal was dismissed as not pressed. The order decides nothing of general application.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

SMT CHIKKAMMA W/O LATE HANUMAIAH

RAMESH S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.

HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

MAHALAKSHMI D/O LATE HANUMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:38097 MFA No. 3171 of 2018

BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

LOKESH S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

VARALAKSHMI D/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

8. PRAKASH S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

RAMA S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

LAKSHMANA

S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

ALL ARE R/AT SINGONAHALLI AGRAHARA VILLAGE YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.

VIJAYA ASAKAR LHV GOVERNMENT GENERAL HOSPITAL DEODURGA, RAICHUR DISTRICT-584 111

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. NOTICE TO R1 TO R5 & R7 TO R10 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED:

NOTICE TO R6 & R11 AND UNSERVED)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:30/01/2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.801/2012 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL

3 -

NC: 2024:KHC:38097 MFA No. 3171 of 2018

JUDGE & JMFC, KUNIGAL AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.4,77,000/-WITH INTEREST AT 9% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed

a memo dated 18.09.2024 seeking leave of this Court to

withdraw this appeal as not pressed.

Memo dated 18.09.2024 is taken on record.

The above appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE

HA

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Bhagyamma D/o Late Hanumaiah

Coram

AI extract

H.T. Narendra Prasad

CNR

KAHC010381372018

Topic

Bench

H.t. Narendra Prasad

Disposal

DISMISSED

Nagaratnamma Vs Kamakshi

18 Sept 2024

Smt Tejashwini D R @ Teja R Vs the Branch Manager

18 Sept 2024