Dismissed

Sri Mohammed Khaleel v. Smt Vani

Karnataka HC21 Oct 2024MFA/3043/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Miscellaneous First Appeal regarding enhancement of motor accident compensation. The appellant filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal subject to liberty to file a cross-objection if the insurer preferred it. The court recorded this liberty and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file cross-objection if insurer prefers appeal.

Sri Mohammed Khaleel Vs Smt Vani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:42181-DB MFA No.3043/2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3043/2024 (MV-D)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI MOHAMMED KHALEEL S/O MOHAMMED BASHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS BUSINESS MAN R/O O S M ROAD, 5^TH CROSS BHADRAVATHI (OWNER OF TATA ACE VEHICLE BEARING REGN. NO. KA-15/7459) …APPELLANT

¶8

(BY SRI SAMEER S N, ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

SMT VANI

¶11

Digitally signed by A K CHANDRIKA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

W/O LATE JAGADHEESHA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS HOUSEWIFE

¶13

SMT NISHMITHA K J W/O MAHESHA K D/O LATE JAGADHEESHA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/O ARALIKOPPA MUDABAGILU POST N R PURA TALUK

¶14

SMT NIKHITA K J D/O LATE JAGADEESHA C D AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶15

SRI NIKHIL S/O LATE JAGADEESHA C D AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶16

¶17

NC: 2024:KHC:42181-DB MFA No.3043/2024

¶18

SRI C V DHARMAYYA GOWDA S/O VENKTAYYA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

¶19

RESPONDENT NOS.1, 3, 4 & 5 ARE R/O KANABURU COLONY K KANABURU, MUTHINA KOPPA N R PURA TALUK

¶20

SRI SHAHID KHAN S/O AMJAD KHAN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/O MOION MOHALLA 7^TH CROSS, ANWAR COLONY HALE PETER, BHADRAVATHI (DRIVER OF THE TATA ACE VEHICLE BEARING REGN. NO. KA-15/7459)

¶21

THE MANAGER HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED SADIQ COMPLEX, N T ROAD OPP. SUNDARA ACHARYA LODGE SHIVAMOGGA (INSURER OF THE TATA ACE VEHICLE BEARING NO 2315 2043 5922 0000 000 VALID FROM 28-10-2021 TO 27-10-2022 … RESPONDENTS

¶22

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.02.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.75/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MACT, N R PURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶23

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶25

¶26

NC: 2024:KHC:42181-DB MFA No.3043/2024

¶27

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶28

(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)

¶29

Learned Counsel for the appellant submits memo for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file cross-

¶30

objection, in case insurer prefers the appeal.

¶31

Reserving such liberty, appeal is dismissed as

¶32

withdrawn.

¶33

Sd/(K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE

¶34

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶35

PKN

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Sri Mohammed Khaleel v. Smt Vani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Mohammed Khaleel v. Smt Vani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhaskaran Chandrasekar Vs Muniraju M

Goura Das Choudhury @ Gour Choudary Vs M/S. I C I C I Lombardo General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Aruna S Vs Laxman D Talageri

Smt. Shobha H N Vs Sri. Suraj Kumar B

Smt Seetha C Vs Sri Nagesh K R

Smt. Puttadevamma Vs Harisha