property has been allotted in favour of the second defendant in the said suit, item No.2 of the property was allotted in favour of the plaintiff and item No.3 of the property has been allotted in favour of another sister. It is his case that the Assistant Revenue Officer, Basavanagudi, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), Bengaluru, upon spot inspection and verification of the documents, has accorded permission and bifurcated the properties by assigning separate municipal numbers to the respective shares and the plaintiff was assigned with the municipal number 30/1 and retained the old No.527/30 in so far as the property that fell to the share of the first defendant by order dated 23.11.1995. In the plaintiff's 'A' schedule property, a building was constructed and they have been paying the taxes to the BBMP. It is their case that at the time of constructing the building, they had left 2x53 feet setback on the southern side of the Schedule 'A' property for free flow of air and light. The defendants' property is situated after the passage of 2x53 ft. left by the plaintiff which is described as the Schedule 'B' property. It is the case of the plaintiff that, now, the defendants are putting up new construction over their property and in that process, they have also made the
