Disposed

Santhosh R v. Mohammed Sadiq Baig

Karnataka HC20 Feb 2024MFA/286/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee Lok Adalat disposed of a miscellaneous appeal filed against a Motor Accident Compensation Tribunal award. The court recorded a settlement wherein the respondents agreed to pay an enhanced lump-sum compensation of Rs. 1,10,000/-, modifying the tribunal's award accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Order disposed by recording a joint settlement memo under which the respondents agree to pay Rs. 1,10,000/- enhanced compensation.

Santhosh R Vs Mohammed Sadiq Baig — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

¶7

¶8

SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 286/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 2825/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Santhosh R. S/o Rajaiah,

¶12

Aged about 35 years,

¶13

R/o Shantigrama Village, Behind KEB Office, Hassan Taluk and District-573 115. ...APPELLANT

¶14

(By Sri. Murthy D.L., Advocate)

¶15

AND

¶16

Mohammed Sadiq Baig S/o Mahaboob Baig, Aged about 42 years, R/at No.1798, 2^nd Cross, Hullana Beedi, K.R. Mohalla, Mysore – 570 001.

¶17

The Regional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., No.656, 1^st Floor, 17^th Main, 5^th Cross, Saraswathipuram, Mysore – 570 009.

¶18

¶19

Ramesha H.P. S/o Putte Gowda N.M., Major, # 189, Nagarakeri-1, Madduru Taluk, Mandya District-571 414. …RESPONDENTS

¶20

(By Sri. A.M. Venkatesh, Advocates for R-2)

¶21

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.09.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.1080/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE 5^TH ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶22

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶23

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶25

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶26

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

¶27

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company

¶28

¶29

has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,10,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Ten Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶30

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶31

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶32

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶33

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

Sd/MEMBER

¶36

Rbv

Santhosh R v. Mohammed Sadiq Baig

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhosh R v. Mohammed Sadiq Baig

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Annappa Marakala Vs Sri Madava Naik

Sri. Haneef Saheb Vs Sri.P.Ibrahim

Eregowda Vs Managing Director

Smt.Rajeshwari Vs K.S.Kusuma

Anusuya Vs K.S.Kusuma

Abhishek H K Vs Shivaraj Shankaramurthy