Appeal against rejection of a temporary injunction application. Counsel for the appellant was absent despite the matter being listed for dismissal and had not amended the cause title as directed; the High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:45916 MFA No. 2502 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2502 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B.N.PUTTALINGAIAH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA D.V.GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43, RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.6298/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE 68TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, REJECTING IA NO.1 FILED U/O 39, RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Inspite of matter being listed for dismissal, learned
counsel for the appellant is absent. The counsel has also not amended the cause title and not filed the amended cause title vide order dated 05.11.2024.
is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Hence, in view of the order dated 05.11.2024, the appeal
is dismissed.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K.V.Nagaraj
B.N.Shivalingamurthy
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
