Dismissed

Smt Sukanya v. H.N.Vishwanath

Karnataka HC9 Feb 2024MFA/2425/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Lok Adalat order concerning a motor accident claim appeal. The High Court Legal Services Committee allowed the appellant to withdraw the second appeal (MFA No. 4525/2023) after settlement negotiations, as the first appeal (MFA No. 2425/2023) was already settled. Consequently, the Miscellaneous First Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn; the appellant was permitted to withdraw the appeal following settlement.

Smt Sukanya Vs H.N.Vishwanath — Execution and Attachment | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 09^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

¶7

¶8

SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 2425/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 2258/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Smt. Sukanya W/o Nagaraju, Aged about 35 years, R/o Samudravalli Village, Shanthigrama Hobli, Hassan Taluk.

¶12

Now R/at Sukanya W/o Nagaraju, Kanchamaranahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Tq. & District – 573 201. ...APPELLANT

¶13

(By Sri. H.J. Anand, Advocate)

¶14

AND

¶15

H.N. Vishwanath S/o Ningegowda, Aged about 42 years, R/at Halasinahalli Village, Dyavalapura Post,

¶16

¶17

Dudda Hobli,

¶18

Hassan Taluk & District-573 201.

¶19

The Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Chandana Complex, Harshamahal Road, Hassan – 573 201. …RESPONDENTS

¶20

(By Smt. Padma S. Uttur, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.c.o. dated 04.08.2023)

¶21

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.01.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.346/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDL. MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶22

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶23

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶25

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company

¶26

along with its representative are present.

¶27

The Learned Counsel for the appellant has filed Memo for Withdrawal stating that by oversight the appellant has filed two appeals bearing MFA No.2425/2023 and MFA No.4525/2023 against the Judgment and Award

¶28

¶29

passed in MVC No.346/2021 on the file of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Member, Addl. MACT, Hassan. Today, after prolonged negotiations, the MFA No.4525/2023 is settled and in view of the same, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed.

¶30

In view of the Memo, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the above appeal. The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the above Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

Sd/MEMBER

¶33

Rbv

Smt Sukanya v. H.N.Vishwanath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sukanya v. H.N.Vishwanath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ananda K L Vs Divisional Controller, Ksrtc

Prakash H v Vs the Managing Director K.S.R.T.C.

Siddamma Vs the Divisional Controller

Smt G Sunanda Vs M/S Tata Aig General Ins Co. Ltd.

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Kum Anushree

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs S Somanna