Motor accident compensation appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellant's counsel was repeatedly absent and the appellant showed no interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 22181 OF 2012 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. BHARAT SHEKHARAPPA AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: BELLARY BOOK DEPOT, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S. P PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
…RESPONDENTS
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(R1 & R2 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988, PRAYING
TO:
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant absent. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 20.04.2024. It
appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)
JUDGE
PJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharat Shekharappa
Smt. Shakuntala W/o Shivaram
Yashavant Narayankar
Mallikarjun S/o Mallappa
Shivashankar Amannavar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
