Dismissed
Vanajakshi v. Imtiyaz Ulla
Karnataka HCMFA/217/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appellants in an employees' compensation enhancement appeal sought to withdraw the appeal; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed it as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:9609 MFA No. 217 of 2018
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 217 OF 2018 (WC)
¶6
BETWEEN:
¶7
- VANAJAKSHI W/O LATE GANGADHARA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
¶8
- B.G.KUSUMA D/O LATE GANGADHARA AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS
¶9
- CHETHAN NAIKA S/O LATE GANGADHARA AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS
¶10
- THIPPAMMA W/O RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
¶11
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vanajakshi
- appellant
B.G. Kusuma
- appellant
Chethan Naika
- appellant
Thippamma
- appellant
Ramanna
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/217/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court