Claimants in a dismissed motor accident compensation petition appealed under Section 173(1) MV Act against the Tribunal's award rejecting their claim. Counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:19065-DB MFA No. 2046 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2046 OF 2017(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/O. H NO.132/10, NARASIMHA BADAVANI, VINOBANAGAARA, SHIVAMOGGA, PIN-577201
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VISHWANATHA POOJARY K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
R/O HIREMALALI VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, PIN-577 236.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.PRASANNA V. R., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.ANUP SEETHARAMA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR B.C.SEETHARAMA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 (VC); R3-SERVICE OF NOTICE DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD 23.08.2021)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.10.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.1127/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-7,
SHIVAMOGGA, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, K. SOMASHEKAR, J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and award rendered by the Court below in MVC No.1127/2013 and this proceeding has been clubbed with
the remaining proceedings which is indicated in the judgment and award rendered by the Court below in a common judgment.
Poojary.K for the appellants and Sri.B.C.Seetharama Rao for respondent No.2 are present before the Court and learned counsel Sri.O.Mahesh for respondent No.4 is appearing through video conference. But the learned counsel namely Sri.Prasanna.V.R is on record for respondent No.1, but there is no representation either through video conference or present before the Court.
memo for withdrawal of this appeal.
withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
1 provisions across 1 enactments
H. Nagabushan
H. Halamma
N. Vijay
Halappa M. G.
The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Rahammathulla
K. Somashekar
Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
