Dismissed
Rathnamma v. Siddegowda
Karnataka HCMFA/1943/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Claimants' appeal for enhancement of motor accident compensation was withdrawn by the appellants through a memo; the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
NC: 2024:KHC:30787 MFA No. 1943 of 2014
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE
¶4
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
¶5
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1943 OF 2014 (MV-I)
¶6
BETWEEN:
¶7
- RATHNAMMA,
¶8
- W/O LATE CHANDRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
¶9
- G.C. SHASHIKUMARI, D/O LATE CHANDRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
¶10
- G.C. SHILPA, D/O LATE CHANDRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
¶11
- G.C. VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE CHANDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
¶12
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
RATHNAMMA
- appellant
G.C. SHASHIKUMARI
- appellant
G.C. SHILPA
- appellant
G.C. VENUGOPAL
- respondent
SIDDEGOWDA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/1943/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court